Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Quality Improvement Article
  • Published:

Quality improvement methods – Part II

Abstract

To solve complex problems in healthcare, providers need the will to make change, well thought-out or evidence-based ideas, and a quality improvement methodology for executing those ideas. This review will focus on specific elements of execution. A previous review by Picarillo (1) discussed the Model for Improvement, process maps, Pareto charts, Ishikawa diagrams, and driver diagrams. Here, Lean/Six Sigma (LSS) is introduced as an additional methodology for quality improvement (QI), including a selected discussion of some associated LSS tools. Specifically, the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) will be reviewed in more detail. This is a tool to proactively identify possible errors in processes of care, prioritize those which may have the biggest impact if they reached the patient, and develop action plans to address them. Finally, Planned Experimentation is presented as a mechanism to organize your testing strategy for ideas for change. Having an understanding of the concepts in this review and that by Picarillo (1) will provide a sound foundation in the methodology and tools needed to address quality problems in healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Picarillo A. Introduction to quality improvement tools for the clinician. J Perinatol. 2018;38:929–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. What is Six Sigma? American Society for Quality, http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/six-sigma/overview/overview.html.

  3. Coughlin K, Flibotte J, O’Connor T, Harris C, Kreger J, Nawab U. Identifying waste in the NICU MRI process. Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting. 2018. Abstract no. 2918113. [Poster Symposium].

  4. Scoville R, Little K. Comparing lean and quality improvement. IHI white paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2014. (Available at IHI.org).

  5. Institute for Healthcare improvement. QI essentials toolkit: failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). 2017. (available at IHI.org).

  6. Chandonnet C, Kahlon P, Rachh P, DeGrazia M, DeWitt E, Flaherty K, et al. Health care failure mode and effects analysis to reduce NICU line-assocaited bloodstream infections. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1961–e1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Demauro S, Douglas E, Karp K, Schmidt B, Patel J, Kronberger A, et al. Improving delivery room management for very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1018–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moen R, Nolan T, Provost L. Quality improvement through planned experimentation. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA. McGraw Hill Books; 2012.

  9. Piazza AJ, Brozanski B, Provost L, Grover TR, Chuo J, Smith JR, et al. SLUG Bug: quality improvement with orchestrated testing leads to NICU CLABSI reduction. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20143642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Posencheg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M.A.P. is on the contract faculty for the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and receives honoraria for teaching QI methodology. The remaining author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coughlin, K., Posencheg, M.A. Quality improvement methods – Part II. J Perinatol 39, 1000–1007 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0382-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0382-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links