Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Palaeoclimate explains a unique proportion of the global variation in soil bacterial communities

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 1, pages 1339–1347 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

The legacy impacts of past climates on the current distribution of soil microbial communities are largely unknown. Here, we use data from more than 1,000 sites from five separate global and regional datasets to identify the importance of palaeoclimatic conditions (Last Glacial Maximum and mid-Holocene) in shaping the current structure of soil bacterial communities in natural and agricultural soils. We show that palaeoclimate explains more of the variation in the richness and composition of bacterial communities than current climate. Moreover, palaeoclimate accounts for a unique fraction of this variation that cannot be predicted from geographical location, current climate, soil properties or plant diversity. Climatic legacies (temperature and precipitation anomalies from the present to ~20 kyr ago) probably shape soil bacterial communities both directly and indirectly through shifts in soil properties and plant communities. The ability to predict the distribution of soil bacteria from either palaeoclimate or current climate declines greatly in agricultural soils, highlighting the fact that anthropogenic activities have a strong influence on soil bacterial diversity. We illustrate how climatic legacies can help to explain the current distribution of soil bacteria in natural ecosystems and advocate that climatic legacies should be considered when predicting microbial responses to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Relative contribution of the different predictors used to model bacterial composition and diversity.
Fig. 2: Structural equation model accounting for the direct and indirect (plant diversity and/or soil properties) effects of climatic legacies on the diversity of bacteria across the five datasets used.
Fig. 3: Contribution of the different predictors for a subset of data from Australia.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monger, C. et al. Legacy effects in linked ecological–soil–geomorphic systems of drylands. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 13–19 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gajewski, K. Impact of Holocene climate variability on Arctic vegetation. Glob. Planet. Chang. 133, 272–287 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Svenning, J.-C. et al. The influence of paleoclimate on present-day patterns in biodiversity and ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. 46, 551–572 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyons, S. K. et al. Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts. Nature 529, 80–83 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martiny, J. B. H. History leaves its mark on soil bacterial diversity. mBio 7, e00784-16 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Andam, C. P. et al. A latitudinal diversity gradient in terrestrial bacteria of the genus Streptomyces. mBio 7, e02200-15 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagg, C. et al. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 28, 10541 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Heijden, M. G. et al. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 296–310 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliverio, A. et al. Identifying the microbial taxa that consistently respond to soil warming across time and space. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 2117–2129 (2017).

  11. Atkinson, T. C. et al. Seasonal temperatures in Britain during the past 22,000 years, reconstructed using beetle remains. Nature 325, 587–592 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fordham, D. A. et al. PaleoView: a tool for generating continuous climate projections spanning the last 21000 years at regional and global scales. Ecography http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03031 (2017).

  13. Lauber, C. L. et al. Soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale: a pyrosequencing-based assessment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5111–5120 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Carbon content and climate variability drive global soil bacterial diversity patterns. Ecol. Monogr. 86, 373–390 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maestre, F. T. et al. Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15684–15689 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vitousek, P. M. Nutrient Cycling and Limitation: Hawai’i as a Model System (Princeton University, New Jersey, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wardle, D. A. et al. Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science 305, 509–513 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Prober, S. M. et al. Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide. Ecol. Lett. 18, 85–95 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leff, J. W. et al. Plant domestication and the assembly of bacterial and fungal communities associated with strains of the common sunflower, Helianthus annuus. New Phytol. 214, 412–423 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leff, J. W. et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10967–10972 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trivedi, P. et al. Response of soil properties and microbial communities to agriculture: implications for primary productivity and soil health indicators. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 990 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. World Development Report: Agriculture for Development (World Bank, Washington DC, 2008).

  23. Legendre, P. et al. Studying beta diversity: ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis. J. Plant Ecol. 1, 3–8 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nogués-Bravo, D. et al. Amplified plant turnover in response to climate change forecast by Late Quaternary records. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 1115–1119 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fieseler, L. et al. Discovery of the novel candidate phylum ‘Poribacteria’ in marine sponges. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 3724–3732 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Youssef, N. H. et al. In silico analysis of the metabolic potential and niche specialization of candidate phylum ‘Latescibacteria’ (WS3). PLoS ONE 10, e0127499 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlesinger, W. H. & Bernhardt, E. S. Biogeochemistry: an Analysis of Global Change (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramirez, K. S. et al. Biogeographic patterns in belowground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20141988 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, J.-T. et al. Coupling of soil prokaryotic diversity and plant diversity across latitudinal forest ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 5, 19561 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations Environment Programme World Atlas of Desertification (Edward Arnold, London, 2002).

  31. Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bates, S. et al. Bacterial communities associated with the lichen symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1309–1314 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bissett, A. et al. Introducing BASE: the Biomes of Australian Soil Environments soil microbial diversity database. GigaScience 20165, 21 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lane, D. J. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (Wiley, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 75, 7537–7541 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Eldridge, D. J. et al. Competition drives the response of soil microbial diversity to increased grazing by vertebrate herbivores. Ecology 98, 1922–1931 (2017).

  39. Edgar, R. G. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gent, P. R. et al. The Community Climate System Model version 4. J. Clim. 24, 4973–4991 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bystriakova, N. et al. Present, past and future of the European rock fern Asplenium fontanum: combining distribution modelling and population genetics to study the effect of climate change on geographic range and genetic diversity. Ann. Bot. 13, 453–465 (2013).

  42. Tallavaaraa, M. et al. Human population dynamics in Europe over the Last Glacial Maximum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8232–8237 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Biogeographic bases for a shift in crop C:N:P stoichiometries during domestication. Ecol. Lett. 19, 564–575 (2016).

  44. Katz, M. H. Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians and Public Health Researchers (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package v. 2.3-0 (2015).

  46. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Archer, E. rfPermute: Estimate Permutation p-Values for Random Forest Importance Metrics. R package v. 1.5.2 (2016).

  48. Grace, J. B. Structural Equation Modeling Natural Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Schermelleh-Engel, K. et al. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol. Res. 8, 23–74 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Lack of functional redundancy in the relationship between microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning. J. Ecol. 104, 936–946 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.D.-B. acknowledges support from the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme H2020-MSCA-IF-2016 under REA grant agreement no. 702057. We acknowledge the contribution of the BASE project partners (DOI: 10.4227/71/561c9bc670099), an initiative supported by Bioplatforms Australia with funds provided by the Australian Commonwealth Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. B.K.S. and M.D-B are supported by the Australian Research Council projects (DP13010484 and DP170104634). D.J.E. was supported by the Hermon Slade Foundation. N.F was supported by grants from the US National Science Foundation (PLR 1241629 and DEB 1542653). The work from J.-Z.H. and the China dataset were supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41230857) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB15020200). The work of F.T.M. and the Global Drylands database were supported by the European Research Council (ERC grant agreements 242658 [BIOCOM] and 647038 [BIODESERT]).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA

    Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo & Noah Fierer

  2. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia

    Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Kelly Hamonts & Brajesh K. Singh

  3. CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia

    Andrew Bissett

  4. Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia

    David J. Eldridge

  5. Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipán Sin Número, 28933, Móstoles, Spain

    Fernando T. Maestre

  6. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China

    Ji-Zheng He, Jun-Tao Wang & Yu-Rong Liu

  7. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Ji-Zheng He

  8. Global Centre for Land Based Innovation, Western Sydney University, Building L9, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, New South Wales, 2751, Australia

    Brajesh K. Singh

  9. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA

    Noah Fierer

Authors
  1. Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Bissett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David J. Eldridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernando T. Maestre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ji-Zheng He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jun-Tao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kelly Hamonts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu-Rong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Brajesh K. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Noah Fierer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.D.-B. conceived the idea of this study in consultation with N.F. The microbial datasets of the Global Drylands were originally compiled by F.T.M, B.K.S. and M.D.-B.; those of the Americas by N.F.; Australia by A.B.; China by J.-Z.H., Y.-R.L. and J.-T.W.; and New South Wales by D.J.E., B.K.S. and K.H. Statistical modelling was conducted by M.D.-B. The manuscript was written by M.D.-B. with contributions from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.D.-B.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Appendices 1–3, Supplementary Tables 1, 3, 4, 8–12, Supplementary Figures 1–15

Supplementary_Table_2

Correlation (Pearson) among bioclimatic variables across different time periods. Worldclim number of climatic variables are shown in Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary_Table_5

Standardized direct effects from s.e.m. in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7

Supplementary_Table_6

Correlations (standardized effects) from s.e.m. in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7

Supplementary_Table_7

Results from random forest analyses aiming to identify the most important bacterial composition predictors of selected palaeoclimatic legacies (AMT or PDM). Acronyms of climatic variables are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Importance is calculated as the per cent increase in the mean square error in our models

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Bissett, A., Eldridge, D.J. et al. Palaeoclimate explains a unique proportion of the global variation in soil bacterial communities. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 1339–1347 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0259-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0259-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing