Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Political behaviour and the acoustics of social media

Nature Human Behaviour volume 1, Article number: 0086 (2017) Cite this article

Social networks are not a new phenomenon — people have always associated with like-minded others — but the advent of social media has led to a vast increase in the amount of social information that we see. We need data and experiments to understand how this information shapes our political landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Feldman, D. Election day dominated Facebook with over 716M election-related interactions. Forbeshttp://go.nature.com/2nN1D4n (2016).

  2. Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S. & Yasseri, T. Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action (Princeton Univ. Press, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hogan, B. How Facebook divides us. The Times Literary Supplement (27 October 2016).

  4. Fletcher, R. & Nielsen, R. K. Is social media use associated with more or less diverse news use? rasmuskleisnielsen.nethttp://go.nature.com/2mAlgf5 (2016).

  5. Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. Science 348, 1130–1132 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S. & Watts, D. J. Science 311, 854–856 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bond, R. M. et al. Nature 489, 295–298 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E. & Hancock, J. T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8788–8790 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Howard, P. N. Facebook and Twitter's real sin goes beyond spreading fake news. Reutershttp://go.nature.com/2nIZISk (2016).

  10. Watts, D. J. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0015 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helen Margetts is Professor of Society and the Internet, and Director of the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 1 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3JS, UK.,

    Helen Margetts

Authors
  1. Helen Margetts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Margetts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Margetts, H. Political behaviour and the acoustics of social media. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0086 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0086

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0086

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing