Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

A tip of the hat to evolutionary change

The relative roles of biological and environmental factors in driving evolutionary change have been unclear. Now fossil analysis shows that their action depends on where an animal group is in its evolutionary trajectory.
  1. Charles R. Marshall

    1. Charles R. Marshall is in the Department of Integrative Biology and the Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Assessing the relative importance of biological interactions (biotic factors) and changes in the physical environment (abiotic factors) in driving evolution has proved difficult, partly owing to the lack of high-quality data sets that combine both fossil remains and associated ancient environmental data. The few studies that have quantified the relative contributions of these two drivers describe a complex relationship1. However, on page 92, Žliobaitė et al.2 report an unexpectedly simple pattern of driver action in peak evolutionary success.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 552, 35-37 (2017)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-017-07440-0

References

  1. Ezard, T. H. G., Aze, T., Pearson, P. N. & Purvis, A. Science 332, 349–351 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Žliobaitė, I., Fortelius, M. & Stenseth, N. C. Nature 552, 92–95 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fortelius, M. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150232 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Žliobaitė, I. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12751–12756 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Valen, L. Evol. Theory 1, 1–30 (1973).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Quental, T. B. & Marshall, C. R. Science 341, 290–292 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Valen, L. Evol. Theory 1, 179–229 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foote, M. et al. Science 318, 1131–1134 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sepkoski, J. J. Jr Paleobiology 7, 36–53 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jablonski, D. Evol. Biol. 44, 427–450 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alroy, J. Quantitative Mammalian Biochronology and Biogeography of North America. PhD thesis (1994).

  12. Foote, M. & Miller, A. I. Principles of Paleontology 185 (Fig. 7.11) (Freeman, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall, C. R. Nature Ecol. Evol. 1, 0165 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gould, S. J. Paleobiology 6, 96–118 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links